Thames Valley Cytology Society

  Volume 6 Issue 2
October 2003

 

Variation in Cytology Screening Performance

Report by Hilary Riches - Chase Farm Hospital

On 17th October, at the Thames Valley Cytology Society meeting held at Chase Farm Hospital, Linda Grosvenor from the Birmingham Cytology Training School gave an interesting talk on how not to misuse statistical analysis in relation to cytology screening using the previous speaker's methods.

Following on from Dr. Mohammed Mohammed's lecture about the misuse of statistics Linda had performed a statistical analysis of her screeners' work. She showed a graph of high grade reporting profile data for screeners from her laboratory for 2001/02.

She had looked at why variations in screener sensitivities occur, ie variation outside normal limits. One screener had a much higher pick-up rate compared to the others. When this was investigated it was seen that this screener was screening the pre-screened abnormals from the outsourced workload. Another screener had 3 high grades from one tray in one day so this also gave a high pick-up rate.Low grade reporting profiles were also looked at. Borderlines and milds were being sent to the pathologist for a time without checking and during this period a higher than normal rate of low grades was reported. During the time when the reporting rates rose it was noticed that a new pathologist had been appointed.

After looking at the figures and reasons that might have affected reporting rates, every abnormal referral was seen by a checker before the pathologist. Multihead microscope sessions with the pathologist where there was disagreement were set up. Smears were reported on concensus. This resulted in a drop of borderlines reported by their laboratory.The percentage of low grades from two screeners were just outside the guidelines. When these cases were looked at one screener had had time off sick following a car accident and the other had been on long-term sick leave.

Finally, upheavals in private lives and at work can cause lapses in concentration, which could account for misses of small amounts of abnormal cells, very small abnormal cells or very pale dyskaryosis. As a result of this Linda recommended keeping a diary of events within the laboratory which might help to explain a variation in performance of reporting abnormals and to use the reporting profiles as a tool to improve quality.