Thames Valley Cytology Society

Volume 5 Issue 1
January 2002

 

BSCC Conference - 2001

Report by Christine Oliver, Bedford Hospital

 

September 2001 saw the 40th annual meeting of the British Society for Clinical Cytology. The meeting was hosted by the Leeds Teaching Hospitals/ Harrowgate Healthcare and held in the lovely town of Harrogate at the very impressive Majestic Hotel.

On arrival we were greeted by Dr Andrew Boon and his fellow workers who sought to make us feel very welcome and presented us with a bone china mug as a souvenir of our visit. I still have the mug presented to delegates at the 25th annual meeting of the BSCC held at Durham University. At that time the commemorative mug was made of pottery. I am not sure if the change from pottery to bone china marks the change of status of cytology or merely a different part of the country.

The trade show was very good reflecting the magnificence of its setting in the huge lounge of the hotel where doors led out on to a veranda and lawns that must have seen many an elegant ball gown and were now host to a lively bunch of enthusiastic cytology personnel. Slide seminars were held in the elegant reading and drawing rooms. We sat beneath beautiful chandeliers and screened smears prepared by liquid based techniques and attempted to improve our knowledge of LBC with the help of Nick Dudding. The group I shared this experience with, I hope, all left feeling as I did that it had been well worth making the effort to attend.

Lectures held in the modern spa suites were all of the excellent standard we have come to expect from the annual meeting. Topics ranged on Monday from HPV testing and its practical use as part of the recall program within cytology to organization and staffing of future laboratories. Preferred papers included the 'Leicestershire Audit' that hit the headlines in the summer of 2001 and few of us had not already heard of. It was however useful to hear details from the staff themselves rather than the interpretation of the press. I feel the lesson learnt is an old one known by cytology staff but still not understood by the general public. Cytological interpretation is not easy.

To the old chestnut of definitions of dyskaryosis - BSCC versus Bethesda - may the best 'term' win.

Tuesday was mainly a 'specialist' day with a symposium on Head and Neck FNA, and the guest lecture on Salivary gland FNA'. However one set of preferred papers between 11 and 12 o'clock were gynaecological and included the fascinatingly entitled 'A review of Post-Trachelectomy Ishmic smear cytology'. This lecture discussed the treatment of young women with cervical cancer and the conservation of the uterus to allow fertility to remain. The tumour is resected and vagina and uterus reunited forming an isthmic-vaginal anastomosis from which brush samples are taken at cytology follow up. Although few of these operations are contemplated, they will be undertaken at centres of expertise, and patients are likely to be referred from all over the country. 43 were performed between 1994 and 2000 at St Bartholomew's Hospital. Long-term follow-up will revert to their local hospital. It does seem wise to know that such techniques are being practiced and the type of cells one can expect to see. Hopefully this lecture plus illustration will appear in an addition of cytopathology. Many of us will never have cause to need it but best to be prepared.

So another year has passed, an important landmark for cytology. Its ruby anniversary, 40 years from first taking a few hesitant steps in a handful of laboratories around the country. Employing a few consultants often travelling between several hospitals where the newly created cytology departments were staffed by enthusiastic 'med lab technicians' interested in microscope work and willing to learn something new. Now we have cytology established in most hospitals. The departments expect to employ possibly 2 or more consultants with a staff of Biomedical scientists and cytoscreeners. There is a training programme and examinations. We have quality control and a National Health Service Cytology Screening Programme.

Between now and its golden anniversary what will happen in the next 10 years. Hopefully steps forward to improve the service for both staff and patients. Maybe a technique that will help to remove the anxiety shared by both. Maybe it will be LBC followed by some sort of automation. We wait to see. All I know is that I will be retired by then and despite many 'scares' that Cytology is not going to survive 40 years on, it is still going strong and all being well will continue to do so.